I think the article is straight-forward and even-handed.
It doesn't say "geocachers are tearing up our forests and wildernesses",
but only that there is the POSSIBILITY for such damage. We all know that
potential is a real one.
Certainly, Geocaching is becoming more and more visible to the general
populace, and our activity will be increasingly scrutinized in the
upcoming years.
There can be little doubt that poorly thought-out caches will be placed,
and that there will be occasional cases of bad judgment while hunting
caches. Our response to those issues (and others), as a community, will
determine how we are viewed by those who are outside, looking in.
This is why I am in favor of the formation of the ARIZONA GEOCACHING
GUILD (or whatever we choose to call it), to provide 'new cacher'
mentoring, unified media relations, and other benefits to the general
Geocaching community as a whole.
Delijaaz@aol.com wrote:
> This article does not portray Geocaching in a very positive way.
>
> http://prescottdailycourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=62&SubSectionID=102&ArticleID=39946&TM=40968.61
> <http://prescottdailycourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=62&SubSectionID=102&ArticleID=39946&TM=40968.61>
>
> delija+ma from Prescott
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
(text/plain)