Re: [Az-Geocaching] cache placement question

I will add my vote with what Brian has written,


----- Original Message -----
From: bcasteel@cox.net
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] cache placement question


Depends on how generous you want to be. If the movement of the cache is small (<100'), I'd think to just update the coords. If greater than that, go for new caches while archiving the others.


>
> From: TeamDaSH@aol.com
> Date: 2003/10/04 Sat PM 08:36:41 EDT
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] cache placement question
>
> I have prepaed a few caches to be placed, including replacing the 2 I already
> have out. The ones I'll be replacing were not originally mine, but were
> adopted from someone leaving the area. I plan to place these two in the same
> general area, but not in the exact spot they were located, as I feel they could be
> better hidden. My question is, should I just replace them and update the
> current description and coordinates, or archive them and relist them to allow for
> new finds? Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!
> Thanks...
> Dave
> Team DaSH
>
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I have prepaed a few caches to be placed, including replacing the 2 I already have out. The ones I'll be replacing were not originally mine, but were adopted from someone leaving the area. I plan to place these two in the same general area, but not in the exact spot they were located, as I feel they could be better hidden. My question is, should I just replace them and update the current description and coordinates, or archive them and relist them to allow for new finds? Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks...
Dave
Team DaSH