Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why don't some geocaches look for caches…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Loran Wilcox
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why don't some geocaches look for caches outside of Arizona?
Another thought for Scott is to start another account on geocaching,com for out of state caches. That way you can have the best of both worlds.

----

Write now I'm up to 15 states. AZ, CA, TX, OK, KS, MO, IL, MI, IN, OH, KY, TN, NC, GA, FL

Loran (Team Sand Dollar)
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Akerman
To:
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:13 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Why don't some geocaches look for caches outside of Arizona?


RopingTheWind wrote:

I only cache in state (AZ). . . I do have to say though that there are some really interesting caches up here in WA and look mighty tempting! :)

Scott,

Why don't you seek caches outside of Arizona? There are many interesting caches all over the world. One of my goals is to find at least one cache in every state. So far I have AZ, CA, UT, NM, TX, CO, KS, WY, IL, WI, NJ, CT, and OK (virtuals only). That's 12 states with at least one regular cache found.

How many states have each of you found caches in? Who has found caches in the most states? Who has found caches outside the USA, and who has found the caches in the most foreign countries?

Ken Akerman (a.k.a. Highpointer)