Right now, I see terracaching.com as more
of a rebellion site. In that regard, there is an inherent desire not to
follow the ‘same rules’, which if left unchecked could become a
huge thorn in the side of all that cachers have worked to achieve in terms of
public official happiness and a happy co-existence with as many groups/leaders
as possible. Competition might be good for all, but I just hope it doesn’t
become unscrupulous.
Brian
Team A.I.
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Gale
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:21
PM
To:
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] TC vs
GC
No one is saying one should drop gc.com and only terracache. I do not
see why the idea of competition bothers some people though. Terracaching isnt
advocating skirting the rules of the land agencies, nor is it attempting to
bring down the level of geocaching. GC.com doesnt have virtuals and
locationless caches any more. (Please dont state the party line that
locationless will return - that was promised more than 2 years ago. As far as
virtuals are concerned, we all know that it is nearly impossible to have them
any more.) Some people want a type of caching that gc.com doesnt care for any
more. Why not welcome another site that allows the other types of caches we
cant get now. Why not welcome another site that expects quality in their
caches. It makes me wonder if it is only about the numbers on
the azgeocaching website. Given how Jeremy has been stating in the forums that
he is considering removing access to see other peoples cache numbers, then even
that may not be possible in the future at azgc.com.
Bill Tomlinson
<billtomlinson@qwest.net> wrote: