Dirk, My guidelines would be real simple and this is for all cache types!Any cache should be listed that is not of a religous or sexual nature and is not on private property or against any land managers policies! On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:18:44 -0700, ShadowAce wrote: > Sorry, forget I mentioned anything.I thought the whole issue was > started because a cache you wanted to list did not fit in the > guidelines!I was hoping your response might include what is or is not > acceptable in your opinion of a cache since you seemed to think > terracaching is a lot more for cachers and away from the big brother > of telling you what you can and cannot hide. > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:11:47 -0700, Guy Aldrich wrote: > > Dirk,I never said there shouldn't be any guidelines! I think > > Terracaching is shooting themselves in the foot by allowing > > inappropriate caches! I would really like to see them succeed! > > > > On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:52:59 -0800 (PST), David Thompsen > > wrote: > > > That was my impression of Terracaching.com as well... geocaching's answer to > > > a pyramid setup. > > > > > > Don't get me wrong. I'm all for healthy competition. But so far I don't > > > see anything of potential interest to me in either Terracaching.com or in > > > Navicache. Geocaching.com is an effective monopoly -- whether you think > > > that's good or bad, it's a plain fact. Terracaching.com seems to have been > > > started with a definite chip on their shoulder. Not sure if that's the best > > > approach. I too wish that virtuals and locationless still had a future at > > > GC.com, but I just don't think that TC.com is the answer for me. > > > > > > --Dave, The Cow Spots > > > > > > ke Olson wrote: > > > I don't know... TC just seems like the MLM of geocaching. you have to > > > be sponsered? > > > > > > who's running it... Amway? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:16:44 -0700, Guy Aldrich wrote: > > > > I posted this to a thread there and sent a copy to the founder of the > > > site. > > > > > > > > In the eye's of the media caches like these are not going to put this > > > > site and cachers in general in a good light.I'm trying to promote this > > > > site in Arizona and with caches like this being approved 80%or better > > > > will just not visit this site again!Did any of you think what the > > > > media might say if they saw this thread?Remember it isn't what I or > > > > you think it's what they think.I think this site has alot of great > > > > idea's and potential !Approving sexually oriented caches will insure > > > > this sites failure! > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit: > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching > > > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource > > http://www.azgeocaching.com > > >