> This raises an interesting question, should caches be archived because > someone considers them dangerous? If so, what is the basis of that > decision? This question comes up with some regularity on the Groundspeak forums. Do a search for "dangerous" on titles only in the "Geocaching Topics" forum and you'll find several. I think as long as a cache description clearly states potential hazards and is given appropriate difficulty and terrain ratings there should be no reason to archive a cache solely because there is some risk involved in finding it. Steve Team Tierra Buena