Mike (Malthusian) wrote
"There's no reason to have to find EVERY single cache out there."

Try insanity. Yes I do have to find them all. At least all of those that are
within 100 miles of my house and not on Indian land.

Team Sand Dollar

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Schwarz <malthusian@mindspring.com>
To: <listserv@azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Just skip the time-consuming ones


> I agree with Loran that finding something shouldn't take TOO much
> time and effort.  Not referring to any cache in particular, I find
> that ANY cache that requires too much time and effort is not worth
> pursuing, so I just ignore it.  I would suggest that you do the
> same.  There's no reason to have to find EVERY single cache out
> there.
>
> After more than 45 minutes of searching for Ya Skala, I just gave
> up, and with the constant parade of people walking by there, I
> decided I would NOT try searching for that one again.  With over
> 15,000 active caches in the world, I believe a few can be skipped.
>
> Just my .02 $ worth.
>
> Mike (Malthusian)
>
> At 10:36:14 -0700 6/3/02, Loran wrote:
> >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why use work emails at geocaching.com?
> >Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002
> >
> >frustration!!!
> >
> >I have personally checked out 4 grocery stores, 2 office product stores,
2
> >variety stores, and one drug store chain. With only a close product match
> >I'm running out of stores. Finding a cache item should not take many
hours
> >and miles.
> >
> >Just my opinion.
> >
> >Team Sand Dollar
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>