I think the intent was that if you donated for the NY/DC victims, it
would be classified 
as a find.  That's the way I read the cache page and that looks like
what everyone else 
is doing.  If nothing else, the find puts a smiley face on the log and I
think that looks
a lot better than the note icon.  It also gives an indication of how
many times the cache
has generated a positive response rather than a neutral response.  This
is basically a
virtual cache and the criterium for logging was stated in the cache
page.

I also have donated blood in the past (94 times) but I have not logged
94 finds.  Nor has
anyone else that I can see.  I donated yesterday (#95) and logged it as
one find.  Do you 
see anything wrong with that?  I don't.

I think there is too much concern over how other people log caches.
That is basically 
between the owner of the cache and the person making the log.  

Bob


-----Original Message-----
From: Cody Brown [mailto:cbrown@triumphairrepair.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:13 PM
To: 'az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com'
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] What's a "Find"??


What's going on with people logging finds on the blood drive cache?  I
too have donated blood and do not consider it a "find".  I say we should
be marking them as "Other".  
Any other comments on this would be greatly appreciated.
Cody